Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Wind Farms›UK Supreme Court Gives Final Clearance to MT Højgaard
Wind Farms

November 6, 2015 · about 11 years ago

UK Supreme Court Gives Final Clearance to MT Højgaard

The UK Supreme Court has upheld the UK Court of Appeal’s April ruling that Denmark’s MT Højgaard is not liable to cover the costs of fixing weaknesses discovered in grouted connections of the foundations at the Robin Rigg Offshore wind farm off the west coast of Scotland. E.ON Climate and Renewables

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

The UK Supreme Court has upheld the UK Court of Appeal’s April ruling that Denmark’s MT Højgaard is not liable to cover the costs of fixing weaknesses discovered in grouted connections of the foundations at the Robin Rigg Offshore wind farm off the west coast of Scotland.

E.ON Climate and Renewables, the owner and operator of the 180 MW Robin Rigg Offshore wind farm, filed an appeal to the UK Supreme Court after the Court of Appeal in London cleared MT Højgaard of any liability claims, thus overturning the ruling made by the High Court of London in April 2014 which found MT Højgaard liable for the damages.

The Supreme Court’s ruling is final, and the matter is considered to be settled. As a consequence, MT Højgaard will recognise DKK 195 million as income under Special items.

In the period between 2007 and 2009, MT Højgaard designed, fabricated and installed 60 foundations in the Solway Firth for the Robin Rigg Offshore wind farm. Following completion of the works, weaknesses were discovered in the grouted connections of the foundations which MT Højgaard says were a result of errors in the then applicable international standard issued by DNV.

E.ON Climate and Renewables claimed MT Højgaard was responsible for the problem with the grouted connections and that it should pay damages. MT Højgaard denied liability arguing that the group had observed the applicable international standard as required by the client.

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Wind FarmsAuthorities & GovernmentBusiness & FinanceOperations & Maintenance

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1$50 billion South Korean investment pushes stalled Alaska LNG project closer to construction
  2. 2TGS on 3D imaging mission to unlock new insights into Malaysia's offshore discovery
  3. 3Petrobras strikes another oil-bearing zone in Equatorial Margin frontier
  4. 4MidOcean gets hold of $4 billion in major capital raise to fuel global LNG push

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free