Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Dredging›USACE Report Recommends Removal of Training Wall
Dredging

April 7, 2020 · about 6 years ago

USACE Report Recommends Removal of Training Wall

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Savannah District is recommending removal of the training wall in the Savannah River which runs roughly down the center of the river for more than a mile through Augusta, Georgia, and North Augusta, South Carolina. The underwater wall was built in the early 20th cen

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email
USACE Report Recommends Removal of Training Wall
USACE photo by Justin Nixon

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Savannah District is recommending removal of the training wall in the Savannah River which runs roughly down the center of the river for more than a mile through Augusta, Georgia, and North Augusta, South Carolina.

The underwater wall was built in the early 20th century to aid commercial navigation.

Commercial traffic on the Savannah River ended in 1979 and the training wall now serves no federal purpose. The submerged wall and sediment deposited behind it form an obstruction to recreational boaters and other users in the section of the river running through the two cities.

The training wall runs from just downstream of 8th Street to 1,800 feet downstream of the Boathouse Community Center, said USACE.

“By removing the training wall and its associated navigation features (Alternative 2), associated risks to recreationists and their watercraft and special events would be eliminated. New recreational opportunities would be made available with the full width of the river unobstructed,” according to the executive summary of the Corps’ study.

“Removal of the training wall would eliminate all risks, limitations, and economic losses associated with it being an obstruction to recreational navigation and special events. Also, the re-established, unobstructed natural river would provide new opportunities for recreational navigation that otherwise would not exist with the training wall,” the summary stated.

The public will have 30 days to comment on the Tentatively Selected Plan.

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

DredgingBusiness & Finance

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Connecting the offshore energy industry through smarter travel
  2. 2Borr Drilling’s rig trio lines up jobs in Africa and Europe
  3. 3Inpex broadens its Southeast Asian horizons with two offshore blocks
  4. 4Dutch LNG terminal capacity rises to 20 billion cubic meters with 4th tank

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free