Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Green Marine›BIFA: Sulphur Surcharge Will Be Extremely Unpopular
Green Marine

September 20, 2018 · about 8 years ago

BIFA: Sulphur Surcharge Will Be Extremely Unpopular

BIFA has slammed the recent introduction of the sulphur surcharge by the container shipping industry

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

The British International Freight Association (BIFA) has slammed the recent introduction of the sulphur surcharge by the container shipping industry, describing it as unjustified.

To remind, the world’s largest liner company Maersk Line is planning to introduce a new fuel adjustment surcharge ahead of the 2020 sulphur cap. The surcharge will be introduced on January 1, 2019, and it will be levied separately from the company’s freight rate.

As explained, the new Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF) surcharge aims at recovering Maersk Line’s costs of compliance with the global sulphur cap, which is set to increase the company’s fuel bill by USD 2 billion a year.

Robert Keen, BIFA Director General, said rises of such magnitude were unjustified and could be construed as “blatant profiteering by shipping lines determined to exploit the situation.”

BIFA would prefer any necessary increases to be consolidated within freight rates and with any required fluctuation being managed against that figure.

“BIFA members are now faced with the task of explaining yet another surcharge to their customers, and what the rationale behind it is. The sulphur surcharge is bound to be extremely unpopular, ” Keen said.

Earlier this year, leading container shipping companies, Maersk Line, MSC and CMA CGM, introduced “emergency” bunker surcharges in response to rising fuel costs.

BIFA has been vocal opponent of the liners’ surcharges, saying that often they are unjust and baseless.

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Green MarineNews

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Dolphin Drilling parts ways with 52-year-old rig and forges pact with SPM
  2. 2Fugro's 18-meter USV on survey duty at 'world's longest interconnector'
  3. 3Energy Drilling lines up 30-month job to keep its rig busy through 2030
  4. 4Siem Industries orders two subsea construction vessels from China

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free