Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Green Marine›Alphaliner: Number of Large-Scale Carriers Shrinks
Green Marine

January 11, 2017 · about 9 years ago

Alphaliner: Number of Large-Scale Carriers Shrinks

The harsh conditions in the container shipping market during the 2016 have led to a drop of large-scale international carriers to 17 as at January 2017, down from 20 a year ago, according to Alphaliner. Namely, the reduction is a result of the acquisition of Singapore-based carrier APL by French maj

2 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

The harsh conditions in the container shipping market during the 2016 have led to a drop of large-scale international carriers to 17 as at January 2017, down from 20 a year ago, according to Alphaliner.

Namely, the reduction is a result of the acquisition of Singapore-based carrier APL by French major CMA CGM, as well as the integration of China’s CSCL within COSCO, while South Korean container carrier Hanjin Shipping made an abrupt exit from the container shipping market in September 2016.

This number will shrink further in 2017 with the pending conclusion of the Hapag-Lloyd and United Arab Shipping Company (UASC) merger , the acquisition of Hamburg Sϋd by Maersk and the merger of K Line, MOL and NYK’s liner shipping businesses, Alphaliner informed.

Additionally, the overall capacity operated by the 17 main carriers decreased by 1.3% over the last 12 months, after taking into account the removal of Hanjin’s tonnage. Collectively, these carriers control 81.2% of the global liner capacity as at January 1, 2017, compared to 83.7% controlled by the 20 main carriers a year ago.

Apart from Hanjin Shipping, five other carriers logged capacity reductions, with Zim recording the largest loss as its operated capacity shrank by 14.8%. MOL and K Line also recorded significant capacity reductions of 10.6% and 7.7%, respectively, ahead of the planned merger with NYK to form the J-3 partnership.

Although CMA CGM Group’s operated capacity grew by 17.3% thanks to the APL purchase, the aggregated capacity of both carriers fell by 9.3%, due mainly to the outsourcing of a substantial part of CMA CGM’s feedering activities.

Hamburg Sϋd was also forced to rationalise its operated capacity due to the very weak trading conditions on its core South America routes. The carrier’s operated fleet shrunk by 6.6% last year.

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Green MarineBusiness & Finance

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1JERA deepens Australian LNG foothold with larger stake in Chevron’s project
  2. 2MoU charts the path for tidal and ocean current energy projects in Chile
  3. 3Seadrill hit with $55 million bill after appeals court upholds rig breach ruling
  4. 4Sunda steps closer to dusting off 1985 gas field as New Zealand bid goes exclusive

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free